The Opportunity of the Big Box Store
It’s always unfortunate to see any business close, but in the case of big box store closings, we can find new opportunity for redevelopment when…
Why, then, do we so often design university and college residence halls as if every student studies, socializes, and lives identically?
On today’s campus, a vibrant melting pot of cultures, neurodiversity, and lived experiences, a one-size-fits-all approach fits no one. Student housing is far more than shelter; it is one of the most visible expressions of a university’s values.

Academic success depends as much on belonging as on coursework. But belonging cannot be forced or prescribed. It relies on two critical architectural elements:
Scale dictates how a space feels to the human body. A monolithic, wide-open common room can easily feel intimidating or exposed, driving away the very students who need connection most. Conversely, spaces that vary in proportion, from expansive halls down to human-scaled alcoves, create a gradient of choices where every individual can find their fit.
Agency is the fundamental freedom to control one’s physical environment rather than being controlled by it. When a building offers choice, architecture stops being a barrier and becomes an active partner.

To build housing that authentically supports a diverse student body, we must abandon generic, single-purpose facilities and design across a full spectrum:
By designing everyone, acknowledging the full social, neurological, and cultural spectrum of modern students, we elevate the baseline experience for everyone. When students are empowered to curate their own environment, residence halls transform from simple dormitories into places of true belonging.